1785-11-01 (static/transcriptions/1785/11/003.jpg)

he by any thing by the said Ramnarain Misser above by Pleading alledged ought not to be barred from having his said action thereupon against him the said Ramnarain Misser because he says that the said Ramnarain Misser did not pay to him the said Kissenchunder Gosaul upon the day and at the time in the said Condition specified the said Sum of Arcot Rupees Two Thousand together with all Interest for the Same which he the said Ramnarain Misser Ought to have paid to the said Kissenchunder Gosaul upon that day according to the Form and Effect of the said Condition in manner and form as the said Ramnarain Misser has above by pleading all aged and this he prays may be inquired of by the Court.
Hunter Plf attey – R. Uvedale.

Demurrer to Replication –
And the said Ramnarain Misser say that the said Plea by the said Kissenchunder Gosaul in manner and form above replying Pleaded, and the matter therein Contained are not Sufficient in Law for the said Kissenchunder Gosaul [ILL] maintain his said Action against the said Ramnarain Misser and he has no need nor is he bound by the Law of the Land in any manner to answer to the said Plea in manner and form aforesaid Pleaded and this he is ready to verify wherefore for default of a Sufficient Replication in this Behalf the said Ramnarain Misser as before prays Judgment and that the said Kissenchunder
Gosaul
No3