1792-07-25 (static/transcriptions/1792/07/110.jpg)

1792. Third Sittings.
Short Notes.[Wednesday] July 25.

of the Plaintiffs than were named Plaintiffs in the Action, as well as the Case of more Partners with the Defendant than were made Defendants, which was the Case of Rice v Shute.
He also said that he thought the Court had determined as Mr. Shaw said they had in the Action by Monohur Doss and Duarcah Doss v Matthew Dawson that the Defendant could not avail himself, of other Partners with the Plaintiff not named as Plaintiffs in the Action, by it’s so appearing in Evidence
/ on