1792-11-13 (static/transcriptions/1792/11/006.jpg)

152.)

the same to the Principal Creditor of such person, or such other Creditor as shall be willing, or desirous to obtain the same.”

from which Mr. Strettell infers that the Court cannot take into consideration the claims of the next of kind at Bombay.

Mr. Burroughs, against the Caveat, relies on the same passage in the Charter; and insists that, as the next of Kin is not within the Jurisdiction, the Court is bound to grant the admon to a Creditor. At the same time he contends that if Lres ad colligi bona should be granted