1783-03-15 (static/transcriptions/1783/03/007.jpg)

1783. 2 Term. [Saturday] March 15.
Was not itself a Conversion, but was only prima facie Evidence of Conversion.

The Opinion of the Court being against Mr. Dunkin on the Point, he next contended that the Damages the Plaintiff ought to recover were the Value of price of the Ship at Macao, for that it was sold here at a great price because it was supposed great advantage could be made by sending Rice to Madras in that Ship, but the Court were of Opinion that Price agreed by the Deft to be paid for the Ship was
/ proper