1791-01-25 (static/transcriptions/1791/01/210.jpg)

(49.

Tuesday 25 January 1791
against Mathew Dawson Esq
Trial
The Account is then read
qu: v. – It is d: 21 Cartic 1196.
[In this accot the amount of the first page, being S. R. 75679..13..7 ½ is sd by the writer N. M. Miter to be indisputably due – the remaining articles making up in the whole S: R: 91208..13..7 ½ are left to be settled by the person to whom the account is addressed, i.e. as Plfs counsel insist by Deft; while the Deft’s advocates contend that the person meant must be Ram G. M. because he is called Maha Sahai. When Plf’s Counsel insist that it is a settled Accot they rely on Deft’s acknowledgements & assent as proved by No 1 & No 5.]

Plf’s case being closed Mr. Ja: Dunkin for Deft contends 1st that the evidence given does not support the Jt.
It is true that prima facie the case is short and simple, and so it would really prove if there were nothing more