1791-07-22 (static/transcriptions/1791/07/181.jpg)

280.)

which had been proved and the Evidence in Reply, if any should become necessary.

James Millar
to correct part of his Evidence. I do not consider any expression in M. de Mello’s letter as containing a charge against Mr. Larkins. The word charge, having been used in the question is taken down in my answer. The committee were instructed only to inquire what concern Mr. L. had in the business.
It was Mr. F.’s duty to attend on the inquiry into the abused at Diamond Harbour, & to point out these abuses, by whomsoever committed. I look at the Proceedings of the 29 Sept. to which I referred before, Mr. Fenwick dated 28th Sept & entered during the proceedings of the 29th