1791-11-07 (static/transcriptions/1791/11/057.jpg)

110.)

in the Plaint.
2. That some of the Counts on which the Jt was given are not actionable.
1. Obj: - the first & 10th Count, are incompatible with the other 9, because they are private letters, on which no action for a libel will lie.

12 Rep:: 35
Edwards v. Watton
It must not only be averred that such a lr was published, but it must be stated & shewn how it was published.
If the Court is of opinion that the averment of public— in these 2 counts is not sufficient, this defect will redner all the other counts ineffectual.
For