1791-11-25 (static/transcriptions/1791/11/464.jpg)

(507.

Mr. Shaw for the Deft in Equity.
Before I enter upon the merits, I shall beg leave to consider the law of the case and particularly to shew how far the Report of quoted from Ambler’s reports of the “Attorney General v. Turner” is applicable to the motion now before the Court.
The proof of the Insanity of a Testator is very different from that of a Forgery. Of the former a number of Witnesses may generally be produced, the authenticity of a deed depends chiefly on the subscribing witnesses; and the Complt
has