1791-11-25 (static/transcriptions/1791/11/466.jpg)

(509.

There is a case Richard v. Symes in 2 Atkins 319, some of the principles of which do seem to be applicable to this case.
If Kubbir Beg is to be believed (No. 16 for Complt) Gheiret Beg was ready enough to acknowledge the forgery, even before the Trial at Law in which he so strenuously supported the deeds as authentick: Even his confession to Behadur Beg is pretended to have made in Febr: 1789, and it was not till Sept: 1789 that he carried him before Mr. Law to make his confession.
Behadur Beg now bring 16 or
17