1792-07-25 (static/transcriptions/1792/07/106.jpg)

1792. Third Sittings.
Short Notes.[Wednesday] July 25.

knew there were five Partners, he ought to have pleaded it.
Mr. Strettell, Ask’d Sir William Jones if he consider’d this as a determination of the Abstract Question, and Sir William Jones said he did, where the Partnership of the Plaintiffs with others was known to the Defendant.
All the Three Judges present agreed in this Opinion.
Mr. Justice Hyde said the Reasoning in the Case in 5th Burrow 2611; Rice v Shute appeared to him to extend to the Case of more Partners of
/ the