1796-03-09 (static/transcriptions/1796/03/043.jpg)
1796. Second Term. [Wednesday] March 9th.
the Evidence had been closed so long ago as December last.
Sir William Dunkin dissented.
Mr. Burroughs, Stated the Purport of the Paper, and insisted it was both admissible and relevant as it contradicted those Witnesses who swore that the Defendant was not in Mr. Shakespear’s Bazar, at the time in question.