1785-11-25 (static/transcriptions/1785/11/076.jpg)

Considered as a receipt [ILL] by forgery from 551 to 2551 there was a consid: Bal: in favour of Plf.
N.B. This evidence of Mr. Davies’s would not have been necessary if the exhibits in that cause had not been all deliver’d back to the parties except this one (no. 35) which the Court had ordered to be detained on Acct of the suspicion of forgery.

Defts Advocate then called on
11th Wts Feiz Ullah Jammatdar