1785-11-28 (static/transcriptions/1785/11/083.jpg)

24 [hrs?] without any charge upon oath.
2. That this infringement of liberty was after the pty had offered Bail.
3. That tho’ the pty complaining was willing to accommodate the diffce & declared his readiness to do so, yet he was prevented by the Magistr.
4. That on the succeeding day the Defts tried the cause on the Evid of the charge only without allowing the accused one day’s respite to produce
his