1785-12-20 (static/transcriptions/1785/12/243.jpg)

87

we have no such Process here.
2. Because the Objection if it were a valid one, comes too late to quash the indictment tho’ it might be made in arrest of judgment.
Mr. W. Dunkin, of Counsel for both the Defendants now present, called on the Counsel for the Prosecution to say whether they meant to prosecute Golaum Ashruff insisting that if he was not to be tried, [therefore?] Defendants are entitled to his Testimony. Mr. Davies, the leading advocate for the Prosecution, said that he was