1786-02-01 (static/transcriptions/1786/02/017.jpg)

(74

in the cause. But the Court tho nevertheless that if they would avail themselves of Mr. Pottinger’s signature they ought to call him to prove it. N. B. no evidence had been given, nor could they give any evidence but the acct in qun, that Mr. Pottinger was in pp with Law.

2 Wts for Deft
Mr. Thos Pottinger
Proves (int: al:) Exh: R.

3d Wts for Deft
Mr. Thomas Graham
was called (by consent) before the X Examination of Pottinger, in order to explain the production of half a better (marked S) to which Mr. P. had been