1786-05-05 (static/transcriptions/1786/05/045.jpg)

he would have told it to the Purchaser.
It has been Argued the Husband in this Case is not liable to answer for the Wife. I do not wish to Argue that he is, but I mean to shew that as a meer Conduit of Conveyance he is bound to Convey.
I shall first answer some other Objections of Mr. Davies’s, and then I mean to shew that the Property is in the Wife
/ It