1786-06-24 (static/transcriptions/1786/06/174.jpg)

(74

the Plf, who [from] his knowl. & [from] char must be above all exception.
He swears that Oodenarain was removed by the Collr in consequence of a heavy balce incurred.
v. Dep: folio 1.
“Hurrykissen appd to attach the whole”
-- “I do not conceive that Oodinarain being dismissed was at all an Act of the Defts.
“No complt made to me.”
From all this the Court must infer that the Dispossion compld of was not the act of Deft, that there