1786-06-24 (static/transcriptions/1786/06/179.jpg)

79)

be nonsuited is that this is an Action of Trs, and the evid: is such as will only maintain an Action on the case.
This is Trs vi & Armis brot by Plf who is supposed to be the real T: for yrs [ILL] who brings this Action for a supposed disturbance of possession.
No evid: that he ever was in the actual possession or legal possession of the premises.
It amts only to this –