1786-08-04 (static/transcriptions/1786/08/007.jpg)

(56

notice of Justification, that the Plf was confined from 3 o’clock till 7 and that he was carried under a guard of Sepahies to a place of confinement – Whereas says he they shod have carried immedly before the Justice who granted the warrant. In the Case of Entick & Carrington it was held that the offr: had not obeyed the warrant, because he had carried Plf before Lovel Stanhope instead of Ld Halifax who granted the Warrant.
11 St: Trials 313.
In Leach’s case, (same book) Ld Md says to bring a case within 24 G. 2. the act must be done in obedce to the warrant.
The