1786-10-23 (static/transcriptions/1786/10/024.jpg)

[ILL])

him when he asserted that he had paid CR 25,000 to Odonnel at the time of the Exec- of that bond.
Now this fact & that [which] is founded on it, viz that Odonnel in conson thereof undertake to pay the bond in London but did not, & the chief consider-s of the bond of indemnity.
The Acct current [which] was produced for proof thereof does not prove it.
But among Mr. O’s papers H: has found a decd of pp,
execd