1786-10-25 (static/transcriptions/1786/10/038.jpg)

30)

point insisted on by the bill viz that Mr. O never engaged to pay the whole of what shd be due on Mr. Herbert’s bond in England, & that if he did Mr. DaCosta never performed the condon on [which] that engagemt is sd to have been made by paying to O: his CR 25000.
“It was says Mr. S. H. by means of such unjust & fraudt misrepresent that your orator was led to execute the indemnity bond.”
“Whereas &c – nor did the sd O: ever engage to pay the same out of his