1786-12-05 (static/transcriptions/1786/12/042.jpg)

(24

Mr. Davies objects to these remarks that the qm on the operation of the Cabooleat has does not arise [from] the Evid: in Reply.

Mr. Dunkin –
I only mention this as connected with the Evid: of Ramhurry, whose testimony being done away leaves the Cabooleat supported only by the Repos— of Sittaram.