1786-12-06 (static/transcriptions/1786/12/067.jpg)

(50

the same that Sittaram now says, & still stronger that Ramhurry saw at that time the paper which can’t be supposed to have been then forged for the distant purpose for [which] it is now produced.
But there is internal evidce in the Cabooleat that is no forgery. For how could Sittaram or B. P. know that Deft had paid those sevl sums which he acknowledges & proves by his books that he had recd