1786-12-06 (static/transcriptions/1786/12/080.jpg)

(62

admor no one cod sue him for it. For this point see Wentworth Off. Ex. 31 – prout.
In Wankford v Wankford 1 Salk 360 306. C. J. Holt says “wn obligee makes the obligor his Execr, tho it is a discharge of the action, yet the Debt is Assets, and the making him Executor does not account to a Legacy, but to payment and a Release. If H. be bound to J. S. in a Bond of 100£ and then J. S. makes H. his Executor, H. has actually received so much Money and is answerable for it, and if he does not administer so much, it is a Devastavit.”
If such a debt due [from] Execr or Admor is assets in his hands it becomes in the prest case due to the Hindoo represve after paymt of Defts, & he has