1786-12-09 (static/transcriptions/1786/12/132.jpg)
114)
Sum CR 34937 stated as a Debt from the Est: at the end of 1185 on accot of Salt. But I sl shew that there can be no connexion betw: this debt in 1185 & the purchase made by D. T. in 1182.
If there had, D. T’s name wod have been mentioned. But wt is stronger is that Deft recd that Sum of SR 12000 early in the yr 1185.
The Evid: of D. T. shews that S. S. cod not be indebted to D. T. – “There was