1786-12-11 (static/transcriptions/1786/12/176.jpg)

(36

more than that one Article.
N. B. If I have taken this correctly and understand it aright, there is an errour in Mr. Davies’s calculation. I conceive he means to assert that all the sums hitherto mention’d by Ramh: Dutt from Deft’s books, viz No. 41 of the set off to 59, inclusive, amount, after deducting 650 AR, to CR 13,520, whereas in fact those 19 Sums after deduct the 650 AR, amount to a large sum than he mentions viz to CR 14511..9-7. But on the other hand that is not the only sum which ought to be deducted. That sum of AR 650 = CR 702, and the sum, included in the same No. of SR 1350 = CR 1566, are both specified to be for the expenses of the Shraud, - are charges in Maug 1188, and may therefore fairly be presumed to be included in the gross charge for the Shraud made in Choitre 1188. Deduces that sum of CR 1566 from CR 14511..A9..P7 and there will remain only CR 12945..A9..P7 a smaller sum than that of CR 13502 for which Deft took credit at the end of the year 1188 as advanced on Accont.
That sum of 650 AR with SR 1350 in our accot make up the amount of 2268 CR No. 56.
Ramh: Dutt reads [from] Deft’s book. “Est of S. S. Dr