1786-12-11 (static/transcriptions/1786/12/178.jpg)

(38

but the specific articles.
The 10 Sums of SR
Set off No. 60 – CR. 1160 – 1000
62 – 2001 – 1725
62 – 446.9.7. 385
With reard to No. 64 Mr. Davies has been led into an error by Ramh: Dutt who says the bond No. 60, was for 4500 S. R. but Callypersd says 4500 CR and so the bond is. – 4500
These 6 are not charges in Deft’s set off –

232 – 200}
232 – 200} not to
2320 – 2000} be recon’d
232 – 200} Causa qua
232 – 200} infra.
464 – 400}

which follow are thus proved by Deft.
The first 4 from his book, the remg. 6 from the bonds No. 61 & No. 65 – all pretended to be pd on acct of Estate to Cally pd Dass, and the 6 last all included in the 4th