1787-11-20 (static/transcriptions/1787/11/391.jpg)

party becomes a Bt because the dd itself is fraudulent by the Stat. 13 Eliz.
In 4 Burrows 2235 see the Case of Alderson & ors v. Temple in which Ld Mansfield says
“The only qu: is wr the endorsing & sending this note to the Deft is fraudulent; and void, as such.
“I choose to put the case upon that ground. and therefore I will avoid laying the stress that might properly be laid upon the necessity of an assent to complete the contract, or on the want of a Delivery.”
I ground my opinion on this “whether the Indorsemt be fraudult. Now The Statutes of Bty leave the Bt till the moment he commits an Act of Bty every power that answer has over his estate. The Statute