1787-11-23 (static/transcriptions/1787/11/410.jpg)

Sealy would not examine him.

Mr. Davies for Deft
contends that he is entitled to a nonsuit.
This is Tr:s vi armis for breaking & entering the Plf’s Close treading down grass, felling Trees, & dragging up the soil.
There is not evidence of felling Trees – but what is of more of consequence is that Plf has neither proved passion, Right of Possion, nor Right of Property