1787-11-26 (static/transcriptions/1787/11/430.jpg)

1787. 4 Sittings. [Monday] Nov 26.

but in such Contracts they Acted as Private Merchants and not as Servants of the Company.
Mr. Dunkin Cited 145 2d Peer Williams Precedent in Chancery 518 = 54 3d P. Williams’ 54, [ILL] Atkins. 49 22d Vezey.
The answers also insists besides Infancy, that the Covenant do not bind him to account for what he did as a private Merchant, and also Insists on not being obliged so long after the Transactions to account because he insists on the Statute of Limitations.