1787-12-03 (static/transcriptions/1787/12/017.jpg)

If Plf has failed in the proof of passion, he has not proved the most [ILL] important part of his case.
The interpreter says Mahal has many meanings I say he rendered it particulars of goods. Now this implies that the goods had been seen & counted, but from the evidence the contrary may fairly be inferred.
No proof of actual conversion nor of a refusal to deliver Mr. Johnson’s letter (Exh: G) does not imply either.
Now Conversion is the gist of the action of Trover, for therein