1788-03-18 (static/transcriptions/1788/03/096.jpg)

were in their possion, & this is not contradicted.

Argumts agt the probability of dryage, wastage &c fall to the ground when we attend to the substantial swearing of the Complainants that none of the goods for which Jt hath been obtained ever came to their hands.

It deserves to be considered who are the parties in this suit & who were so at Com Law. Sittaram Gose was a nominal but not a real Deft at law. He is is now a Deft in Equity, & he has made