1788-08-11 (static/transcriptions/1788/08/082.jpg)

I now come to the 2d point that supposing the discovery be barred by flux of time, that Bar has been removed by the Defts own Acts.

See Precdts in Chanc 385-386
Andrews v Brown & Exov.
Advert in the Gazette &tc.

2 P Wms 373
Blakeway v E. of Strafford

Devise in a will in Trust for the payment of Testator’s debts extends to debts that have been due above 6 years, and that the State of Limit cod not be pleaded in Bar of a demand for those debts.

But note that “an appeal was brot in the Ho of Lords; the Chancellor’s decree was reversed, & the