1788-08-26 (static/transcriptions/1788/08/219.jpg)

And thereupon Issue is joined.

2d Plea – of a Set off

Replication to the 2d Plea – protesting that Plf was not nor is indebted modo & forma, nevertheless for Replication he says that he was not (at the time of exhib Plaint) indebted to Deft in more money than was due from Deft to Plf.

Issue thereon

1 Wts for Plf
Mich: Geo Pendergast proves the Jurisdon, the following Exhts & the case.

Read Exh A acct Current
Exh B accot of Sales
Exh C a ltr from Deft to Wts
Exh D anor Do

Jt for Plf 2542, in which is not included a Sum of money recd from Mr. Fenwick for cotton thread after the plaint was filed.