1788-11-28 (static/transcriptions/1788/11/154.jpg)

Will appear in evidence that the money was borrowd for performing the Sherad of the mother to which all her sons & Grandsons were bound, and that Bridjooram, who was then the eldest son, (Sittaram being dd) desired it.

But as there can be no Decree against Bridjooram who is dead nor his sons who are not made parties, if the Court sd be of opinion that he at the time of his death was entitled to a share of the premes, we will rather relinquish all claim upon his chare, than be at any further expense.