1778-01-20 (static/transcriptions/1778/01/012.jpg)

1778. 1 Term. [Tuesday] Jan: 20.

might find it the easiest way to accommodate their difference by the mediation of these Officers of the Court who could not practise as Attorneys, which are only the two Masters, and the Prothonotary and the Register. The Advocates said they could not depart from their Rules, till by general consent they were alter’d, as by general consent they were made.

[Triple Line]
Sir Robert Chambers, knight, came in after this matter was over, at Eleven o’Clock.

[Triple Line]
William Bondfeild
v
Henry Guinand.
An action on an Insurance Bond.
The Interest of the Plaintiff Mr. Bondfeild was in the Policy stated to be a Respondentia Interest on the Snow Assistance, and was in the Policy Valued at 1303 Current Rupees being the Principal and Interest on a Respondentia Bond bearing date the ninth of March.
In this cause the Policy of Insurance was admitted, and the loss of the Ship within the Terms of the Policy; but the payment was
disputed