1778-01-20 (static/transcriptions/1778/01/009.jpg)

he in the present case could not send the instructions the night before because he did not know of the Error till this morning when he was told of it by Mr. Whittall, Attorney for the Plaintiff.
Impey said. He did not wish to interfere with any regulations made by the Advocates, nor with any Counter-Regulations that might be made by the Attorneys. That the present instance was one, which shew’d the inconveniences that might arise from these regulations: It is proper where there is any thing to be consider’d that the Advocates should have reasonable time to consider, but here there is nothing to consider, it is meerly of course. It is not decent to the Court to make regulations that obstruct the business of the Court. It is my duty to see that the business is not obstructed. Mr. Whittall; attorney, consented to the motion made by Mr. Uvedale; I said, Will no Gentleman take this consent from Mr. Whittall? No One did. Impey said, this is still a stronger instance. No time to consider can be required to give a consent on an authority so to do. The Attorney can not know before what will be moved, but when it is moved may find it the
/ Interest