1791-02-08 (static/transcriptions/1791/02/055.jpg)

(147.

Tuesday 8 February 1791

against Matthew Dawson Esq:
Trial

has admitted No 20 to be read which he contends is inadmissible.
The other reason is that R. G. M. has been exd on Oath, & his declarations when he was not on Oath shod be admd.

[Single Line]
The court is unanimously of opinion that neither 13 nor 19 can be read in Evidence.
Mr. Davies admits that w No 22, is a true transl— of Exh: No 22 and also of No 20.
Read. For Deft the sd Translation qu: v
postea