1791-06-30 (static/transcriptions/1791/06/311.jpg)

1791. Third Term. [Thursday] June 30.

The Case of Dingley v Moor in Croke – Elizabth is strongly for me, where there are two Statutes, and the latter only continues the former without altering it, the Conclusion ought to be “contra formam Statuti” but if it makes any alteration the Conclusion ought to be “Contra formam statutorum” and if it is “Contra formam statute” it is good, for it shall be understood to be that One of the Statutes which is best for the King, but this is a negative against taking the best for the Company or
/ for