1791-11-24 (static/transcriptions/1791/11/287.jpg)

(329.

For Deft – No 2. Defendant’s Answer.
this Defendt positively denies that she ever cautioned the said Zekeriah against any discovery whatever lest she this Defendt should be ruined. And this Defendant further positively denies that the said Zekeriah ever answered that he would confirm the said writings by affidavit provided the said Ghyrut Beg would affix his seal thereto nor did the said Cojah Zekeriah upon any occasion whatever at any time whatever answer this Defendt to any such or the like purport or Effect except that the said Cojah Zekeriah may have said to this Defendt that he would as this Defendt is advised and believes he did by his evidence on the trial of the said actually confirm the said two Deeds and writing called Hebanamah & Ekrauraum. And this Defendt further answering most positively denies that any person whatever at any time whatever after the death of the said Shabaz Beg Khan at the desire at the desire of any person whatever affixed the seal of the said Ghyrut Beg to either of the said two Deeds or Instruments called Hebanamah and Ekrauraum. And this Defendt particularly denies it to be true that in the said month of Shawaul in the said fussully year 1184 after the death of the said Shabaz Beg KHan the wife of the said Ghyrut Beg at the desire of this Defendt affixed the seal of the said Ghyrut Beg to the said two Deeds or Instruments as in the said Bill of Complaint is falsely alledged and setforth. And this Defend further most positively denies that the said Ghyrut Beg and his said wife ever so remonstrated with this Defendt and the said Cojah Zekeriah, and this Defendt ever so assured the said Ghyrut
Beg