1791-11-29 (static/transcriptions/1791/11/505.jpg)

548.)

Sittings after Fourth Term.
E. I. Company &al v. Naderah Begum
the Ultumga, nor to more than the difference between what she has recd under the execution, with interest thereon and the fourth part of the value of the goods taken.
Mr. Ledlie – for Deft observes in the cases cited by Mr. Davies & Mr. Burroughs.
1. That of Norris v Freeman in 3 Wilson’s Rep: 38.
In that case only one of the subscribing wtses was called who had proved the bond.
The Forgery in the case now before the court was materially & directly controverted; for the deft produced the 2 persian deeds
for