1792-06-22 (static/transcriptions/1792/06/021.jpg)

78.)

a bill agt Devisee in possession, the court ought to appoint a receiver. He quotes & argues from the case of
Knight v. Duplesis 1 Vezey 324 & the same case in 2 Vezey 361.
See on [ILL] Same case [ILL]
Much more cautious will the Cot be where a Devisee applies for an Injunction & a receiver agt an Heir at law in possession.
Not sworn on part of Complainants that the rents are in danger, or that Defts are either insolvent or likely to abscond.
If there be a title in Complts, it must be a title at Com: Law. The whole litigation ought to be at Law. One short plaint in Ejectment would bring the right before the Court to be determined on viva voce evidence.
In