1777-11-24 (static/transcriptions/1777/11/019.jpg)

1777. Sittings. [Monday] Nov. 24.

Therefore
Judgment for the Defendants.
With Costs.

[Double Line]
Narrahurry Bysaack
v
Juggomohun Sein.
In this Case Tresspass and Case were join’d. Newman said it had been determined they might be Join’d. It is true some thing of that kind has been said, but nothing fully determined.
Impey now said nothing had been fully settled, that when a proper case arose it would be very proper to be considered. The reason we inclined to think they might be join’d, was that the technical reason in England of the process being different does not hold here, where the process is the same. I said I thought there were other objections to the joining Case and Trespass, which had occurr’d after that had been said in Court and which I had afterward mention’d in Court, but I did not now recollect but would look back for them in my Note book. Impey said the Pleas were different in one case Non Assumpsit
in