1782-11-20 (static/transcriptions/1782/11/015.jpg)

1782 4 Sittings [[Wednesday]] Nov. 20
Was a Joint Action and the Jurisdiction over both could not be proved: But afterward it was proved that at the time of the Action having been brought, Mahadeb Dutt, as well as the other Defendant, was an Inhabitant of Calcutta, and therefore no Question arose on the Jurisdiction in this Cause, but the Plaintiff went on and proved the Debt, and there was Judgment for the Plaintiff.
Damages____408 A. R. with Costs
Sir E. Impey, Said in this Cause: This Question is to be decided on the Law of the Hindoos, and if it appears One
/of