1783-03-27 (static/transcriptions/1783/03/060.jpg)

on for the Directions on the Masters Report.
On taking the account before the Master it has appeared that Da Costa is accountable for a Large Sum as administrator of Griffiths, which he had not admitted by his answer, and the Court now directed that Sum to be added to the Sum in the Master’s Report.
Periera and Dessa moved to have their Costs paid by the other Defendant Da Costa, but the Court thought they did not appear so perfectly clear of Misconduct in their Trust as to be intituled to have
/ their