1778-03-28 (static/transcriptions/1778/03/046.jpg)

1778. 2 Term. [Saturday] March 28.

in Four Hundred Thousand Rupees each: and Mr. Whittall, Attorney for the Plaintiff, ought according to the Consent to enter immediately, his acceptance of this Bail.
I afterward saw the Bond, and the Condition was in effect the same as the Condition [which?] Bail to the Court, commonly call’d Bail above is subject to.
After this the argument of the Demurrer came on, to be argued the second time by Mr. Tilghman the Advocate for the Defendant, and Mr. Sealey, the Advocate for the Plaintiff, in the Cause of
Bostom Churn Gose
v
Haliburton.
Mr. Tilghman. I shall first argue on the Question made on the Pleadings, whether the Plaintiff has shewn himself to be within the exception of the Statute of bringing his action within due time after his discharge from such an imprisonment as is an excuse for his not commencing his Action within four years after the assault. Then I shall argue the other Point which though not made on the Pleadings has been raised in the Cause; whether the
/ Statute