1778-11-25 (static/transcriptions/1778/11/076.jpg)

1778. 4 Sittings. [Wednesday] Nov. 25th.

said this was not proof of the Note, because the Note was not shewn to the Defendant. A Bengally was also call’d to prove the Note, he could not read English, but he swore he saw the Defendant sign it. He said he knew it by his own Bengal writing on it, he said he wrote it the next day, and that in the interim the Plaintiff kept the Note. Impey said, Then it may not be the same Note. And there being no Witness present to prove the Defendant’s hand writing, there was, by direction of the Court, a Non Suit.

Wramhorry
v
Matthew Richard Smith.
An Action on a Promissory Note, and for Money laid out
Dammages - - - 735 Current Rupees.

Francis Le Gallais
v
Ramsunder Metre.
This was an Action on a Special Agreement written in Bengal, to pay for Oyster Shells Sold above a Thousand Rupees, as Security if the buyer did not pay in two months according to the Bargain. The Bengal dates were right, but the Contract was
/ said