1787-11-03 (static/transcriptions/1787/11/022.jpg)

was sustained of 4990 SR
2d Cot for SR 5000 for good sold & deliver’d
3d 5000 – intended to be on a qm valebaut – but by mistake the words of a qm meruit are used.
4. for 5000 laid out & expended.
5. 5000 on an insimul comput:

Plea Non assumpsit
Issue joined.
Mr. Atkinson opened the pleading & then
Mr. Jas Dunkin stated the Plf’s Case.

Part of the goods purchased were delivered, part not taken away & resolt on that part there was a Loss by resale of 54 SR, which togr with the charge
of