1788-01-09 (static/transcriptions/1788/01/071.jpg)

and immediately crossed out the Simple Contr: Debt fro his own book –
But it was detd that the paymt must be understood in the manner in [which] Deft would pay it, & not in the manner in [which] Plf sad he wod rec: it.
This case is applic— to the entries in the books of Bulram Gose.
There is evidence that in this case the first rule thus explained, is in favr of Complainants –