1788-01-15 (static/transcriptions/1788/01/108.jpg)

Carelessness at the best, contrary to the truth, and producing wtses to swear so – (particularly Phanoos Bagram) certainly, with the highest justice, subjects the Defendants to the payment of costs.
But say the Defts, the Complainant has subjected himself by pleading non est factum at law, which amounts to an admission of Assets.
I answer he could do nothing else. He cod not deny assets, for he had assets in his hands, but they were bound by two sercars which he could not plead against a bond.
Had Mr. P.